Notes / Concentration Inequalities
5.5 Martingale Concentration Inequalities
5.5.1 Martingale Concentration
Now we discuss martingale case. Recall that \(\{D_k\}_{k \geq 1}\) is a martingale difference sequence if \(\{\sum _{k=1}^n D_k\}_{n \geq 1}\) is a martingale with respect
to \(\{\mathcal {F}_k\}_{k \geq 1}\) .
Theorem 5.48 (Martingale Concentration Inequality) . Let \(\{(D_k, \mathcal {F}_k)\}\) be a martingale difference sequence. If \[ \mathbb {E}[e^{\lambda D_k} \mid \mathcal {F}_{k-1}] \leq e^{\lambda ^2 \nu _k^2 / 2} \quad \text {a.s. } \forall \lambda \leq \frac {1}{\alpha _k}, \]
then
1. \(\sum _{k=1}^n D_k\) is \(\mathrm {sE}\left (\sqrt {\sum _{k=1}^n \nu _k^2}, \max _{k \leq n} \alpha _k\right )\) .
2. \[ \mathbb {P}\left ( \left | \sum _{k=1}^n D_k \right | \geq t \right ) \leq 2 \exp \left ( -\min \left \{ \frac {t^2}{2 \sum _{k=1}^n \nu _k^2}, \frac {t}{2\alpha _*} \right \} \right ) \]
Corollary 5.49 (Azuma-Hoeffding Inequality) . Let \(\{(D_k, \mathcal {F}_k)\}\) be a martingale difference sequence. Suppose there exists
\(\{(a_k, b_k)\}_{k=1}^n\) such that \(D_k \in (a_k, b_k)\) a.s., where \(b_k, a_k\) are \(\mathcal {F}_{k-1}\) -measurable and \(|b_k - a_k| \leq L_k\) . Then
1. \(\sum _{k=1}^n D_k\) is \(\mathrm {sG}\left (\sqrt {\sum _{k=1}^n L_k^2}/2\right )\) .
2. \[ \mathbb {P}\left ( \left | \sum _{k=1}^n D_k \right | \geq t \right ) \leq 2 \exp \left ( -\frac {2t^2}{\sum _{k=1}^n (b_k - a_k)^2} \right ). \]
Definition 5.50. \(f(x_1, \ldots , x_n)\) is a bounded difference function if for all \(k \in [n]\) , \(x_{1:n}, x'_k\) , \[ |f(x_{1:k-1}, x_k, x_{k+1:n}) - f(x_{1:k-1}, x'_k, x_{k+1:n})| \leq L_k. \]
This is a condition on how much the function changes if we change 1 coordinate. Here is a corollary of the
Azuma-Hoeffding inequality.
Corollary 5.51 (McDiarmid's Inequality) . Suppose that \(f : \mathbb {R}^n \to \mathbb {R}\) is \(L_{1:n}\) bounded and \(X_{1:n}\) has independent
components. Then for all \(t \geq 0\) , \[ \mathbb {P}(|f(X_{1:n}) - \mathbb {E}[f(X_{1:n})]| \geq t) \leq 2 \exp \left ( -\frac {2t^2}{\sum _{k=1}^n L_k^2} \right ). \]
5.5.2 Gaussian Complexity
Gaussian complexity is a very important notion in compressed sensing. Suppose we have a set \(A \subseteq \mathbb {R}^n\) . How do we
measure its “size”? A reasonable size function \(S\) should at least satisfy \(S(A) \leq S(B)\) if \(A \subseteq B\) . Here are some reasonable size
functions:
1. Euclidean width: \(D(A) = \max _{a \in A} \|a\|_2\) .
2. Dimension: A line has dimension 1, and a plane has dimension 2.
Definition 5.52. Given a set \(A\) , let \(W = (W_1, \ldots , W_n)^\top \in \mathbb {R}^n\) with \(W_i \overset {\text {iid}}{\sim } \mathcal {N}(0,1)\) . The Gaussian complexity or “statistical dimension ” of \(A\) is
\[ \mathcal {G}(A) := \mathbb {E}_{W \sim N(0, I_n)} \left [ \sup _{a \in A} \langle a, W \rangle \right ]. \]
Note that if we don’t take the supremum in the expectation, the quantity would be 0. This quantity is always
nonnegative.
Example 5.53. Let \(B_p(r) = \{x \in \mathbb {R}^n : \|x\|_p \leq r\}\) . Then \[ \mathcal {G}(B_p(r)) = \mathbb {E}\left [ \sup _{\|x\|_p \leq r} \langle x, W \rangle \right ]. \] If \(q\) is the conjugate exponent of \(p\) , so \(\frac {1}{p} + \frac {1}{q} = 1\) , this is the variational representation
of the \(\|\cdot \|_q\) norm: \[ r \, \mathbb {E}[\|W\|_q] \approx r n^{1/q}. \]
Note that if \(p_1 \leq p_2\) , then \(q_1 \geq q_2\) , so \(\mathcal {G}(B_{p_1}(r)) \leq \mathcal {G}(B_{p_2}(r))\) .
We want to show that \(f(W) := \sup _{a \in A} \langle a, W \rangle \) concentrates. Fix \(w, w' \in \mathbb {R}^n\) . Then \[ f(w) - f(w') = \sup _{a \in A} \langle a, w \rangle - \sup _{a \in A} \langle a, w' \rangle . \] Denote \(a^* = \arg \max _a \langle a, w \rangle \) : \begin{align*} f(w) - f(w') &= \langle a^*, w \rangle - \sup _{a \in A} \langle a, w' \rangle \\ &= \inf _{a \in A} \langle a^*, w \rangle - \langle a, w' \rangle \\ &\leq \langle a^*, w - w' \rangle \\ &\leq \|a_*\| \|w - w'\|_2 \\ &\leq D(A) \|w - w'\|_2. \end{align*}
The other side can be proven similarly, so \(f\) is \(D(A)\) -Lipschitz. Concentration says that \(f(W)\) is \(\mathrm {sG}(D(A))\) .
Example 5.54. If we let \(A = B_2(r)\) , then \[ \mathbb {E}[f(W)] = \mathcal {G}(B_2(r)) = r\sqrt {n}, \] since \(D(A) = r\) .